On Twitter: @JamesFirth and @s_r_o_c (post feed)

Got a tip? tip@sroc.eu

Thursday, 24 February 2011

Cost of AV in perspective

Firstly, I very much doubt AV will cost the £250m the No2AV camp claim.  I explain why on my campaign blog here.

Even if we decide to introduce electronic counting at the same time as AV, that's 2 distinct decisions with 2 separate benefits. I've observed a general election count - I can see benefits of electronic counting even if we keep the existing first past the post voting system.

And it's simply disingenuous to include the cost of holding a referendum into the cost of AV.  One could argue the cost of voting "No" is the cost of hosting the referendum, since the No2AV camp clearly can't come up with any solid arguments not to take this progressive step - other than cost!

Besides, council elections are happening in many parts of the England, plus there's already Assembly elections in Wales and Northern Ireland and Scottish Parliament elections on May 5th.  It's far cheaper to hold a referendum at the same time as other elections, 5th May 2011 seems an ideal date!

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comments will be accepted so long as they're on-topic, do not include gratuitous language and do not include personal attacks or libellous assertions.

Comments are the views of the commentator and not necessarily the view of the blog owner.

Comments on newer posts are not normally pre-moderated and the blog owner cannot be held responsible for comments made by 3rd parties.

Requests for comment removal will be considered via the Contact section (above) or email to editorial@slightlyrightofcentre.com.